At a minimum, it'll be great for home use. So I don't know if the Korg will be going in a case to jams or not. The PolyTune is a hinge with metal clip, you'd have to abuse it to break it. Probably as sturdy as the Peterson, about which I have the same complaint. And break they might, as the arms and hinges don't look all that sturdy to me. The cons are that it's larger than the PolyTune (though smaller than the Peterson), and it has more hinge points to break. My few uses of it say it's quicker to tune up than with the PolyTune, easier to nail where the string needs to be. My old eyes can more easily discern what the display is telling me with the Korg than the PolyTune. It seems to do just as well in real life. What can I say, that display in the video sho' does look purty. Or I'll use the itty bitty Planet Waves/D'addario hidden in the case if I forgot the PolyTune.Īt the prompting of user Explorer above, I had Amazon drop off a Korg Sledgehammer 100. So I've stuck with my workhorse PolyTune clip, which is accurate enough in strobe mode, and packs small. And I find the interface of the Petersons to be.fiddly. That's not going to work in the middle of a jam. The clip version doesn't seem to pick up well on any of my mandolins, I have to hit the strings pretty hard. But for mandolin, I just don't like them. The StroboClip does a good job on guitar. I've got the big Strobo Plus, which works well for fiddle, or anything I plug into line-in (of course). I want to like the Peterson tuners, I really do. I get that the new Peterson will be only $60, but even the additional $30 is a waste for me. If the criteria is highest accuracy at lowest price, for the $30 one can normally find on the Korg Sledgehammer Custom 100, this is the best headstock strobe tuner I've found. Of course, if one needs one of the alternate tuning schemes built into the Peterson tuning and doesn't mind a slower reacting tuner, spending the additional $55 for the $80 Peterson (over twice as much as for the Korg) makes sense. I have no beats or detuning problems on my various mando family instruments, and as my instruments are set up well, I have never had to worry about having to "sweeten" the tuning for bad intonation and string deflection. It was great on all kinds of instruments, and even did well on banjo, which requires using some kind of special "hold" mode on the Peterson to compensate for its slower reactions. We tested it against a friend's current Peterson Clip, with the results being just as shown in the video. I searched and waited, and found one for $30 delivered. The Korg seemed a bit faster and more sensitive in the demo, so I did a little more research, and discovered that Korg also has the Korg Sledgehammer Custom 100, which takes the AAA battery instead of a button cell battery, with a substantial increase in battery life (to be expected with a much larger battery) without an increase in tuner size. I finally found a demo showing a side-by-side comparison. I recently stumbled across the Korg Sledgehammer Pro headstock tuner, which claims to have the same accuracy as the range of Peterson tuners. I haven't wanted to buy a Peterson Clip for $80 to only get 0.1 accuracy, preferring to wait for either a higher accuracy 0.02 Turbo Clip or a reputable but less expensive 0.1 strobe clip. Better accuracy makes a difference, and becomes even more important when playing unison-strung and octave-strung courses like on mandolin and bouzouki, and octaves on pure crystalline instruments like the kantele. I happily use my various Turbo Tuners from Sonic Research most of the time, but sometimes when playing acoustically I wish for a headstock strobe tuner with the 0.02 accuracy of the Turbo Tuner.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |